What is one advantage of the competing strategy in managing conflict?

Choosing the strategy that quickly asserts a position provides a clear advantage in conflict management. When parties engage in a competing strategy, they prioritize their own needs and objectives, often aiming to win the argument or decision at hand. This swift approach can be particularly beneficial in situations where decisive action is required, such as in emergencies or when time constraints are pressing.

By asserting their position quickly, individuals can potentially establish clear boundaries and expectations, which may lead to immediate resolutions. This can prevent prolonged disputes and stabilize situations that may otherwise escalate if left unaddressed. Consequently, the ability to take a firm stance can create a sense of direction and control, which, despite its implications, can be effective in certain contexts.

While the competing strategy does lead to certain drawbacks, such as potential resentment or the risk of a time-consuming process when followed by conflicts, its capacity to deliver immediate outcomes is a significant advantage in managing situations that call for rapid decision-making.